You’ll recall that I wrote at length
last year about bill B-21-0385, the “Citizens with Intellectual Disabilities
Civil Rights Restoration Act.” (Enter “B21-0385”
in the “Search This Blog” box to the right to read my past blog posts on this
subject.) Last year a scheduled hearing
was postponed due to “Snowzilla,” and the committee chair, Yvette Alexander, never
rescheduled that hearing. Now she no
longer is on the council. (Maybe there’s a relationship there?)
Well, there’s a new committee focused
on human services, and it’s chaired by councilmember Brianne Nadeau. NOW SHE NEEDS TO HEAR FROM YOU, and so do the
other committee members! (See the new
page I’ve added to the right, entitled “D.C. Council Human Services Committee” –
it will come in handy!) Why do you need
to contact them? Because B21-0385 has
been resubmitted as B22-0154, and there will be a hearing next Thursday, June 15,
at 10 A.M. on the bill – http://dccouncil.us/events/human-services-public-hearing1. Testify in person if you can, at least submit
written testimony if you can’t, and by
all means write to the committee members, and to your own ward
councilmember, to express support for this important bill.
If you’d like to learn more, the
bill, here is the full bill -http://lims.dccouncil.us/Download/37567/B22-0154-Introduction.pdf
(if you get a pop-up window requesting a password, just close it and the bill
will load). Here too are some Frequently
Asked Questions from the DDS website: https://dds.dc.gov/sites/default/files/dc/sites/dds/publication/attachments/CIDCRRA%20FAQ.pdf. And again, the bill is B22-0154, the Citizens with
Intellectual Disabilities Civil Rights Restoration Act.
Incidentally, I don’t much like
the bill’s title either. Honestly, when
the city council first passed its 1978 bill to move people with disabilities in
our city out of Forest Haven and into the community, they were ahead of their
time, so “restoration” is maybe a little extreme. But without question times have changed, the
system is way out of date, and disability advocates in our city and throughout
the country are working hard to get the courts out of their business so people
can take their lives into their own hands.
I know, I know. Some of you reading this like the current system. But look.
There are only a little over 700 people still under so-called “civil commitment” in
D.C., and the bill gives every one of
them the right to maintain that status if they like their lawyer and don’t want
to change. In fact, the bill as resubmitted
makes it even easier for those who are under civil commitment to remain under
that system if they want to (and also clarifies that having a supported
decision maker doesn’t prevent a person from designating someone to have
medical and general powers of attorney as well, an issue dear to my heart). So please, I implore the lawyers and others
who have come to rely on the civil commitment system, by all means keep it for
yourselves but don’t stand in the way of further progress in our city by
opposing this bill. Have what you want,
but don’t force everyone to do the same.
That’s not fair.
And to the rest of you – the majority
of my readers, I hope. This is about
rights, and progress, for those with disabilities in D.C. and their family
members, friends and other supporters: even
if you wrote the council last year about the earlier version of the bill, WRITE
AGAIN. The time is now to get the hearing scheduled. It won’t take
you long. And you can – please, we must – make a real difference.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Agree? Disagree? Have more to say? Comment here!